Packet 2: Tossup 17
Description acceptable. A 2013 essay collection by Pigliucci and Boudry “reconsiders” this problem by arguing against a paper which discusses three “metaphilosophical” questions regarding it. Paul Thagard gave two conditions to solve this problem, the subject of a Larry Laudan paper titled for its “demise.” Michèle Lamont built on Thomas F. Gieryn’s idea of a type of “work” initially proposed to solve this problem. One solution to this problem distinguishes activities that engage in (*) “puzzle-solving,” which characterizes a discipline’s “normal” form according to Thomas Kuhn. The logical positivist criterion of verification to solve this problem was opposed by Karl Popper’s falsifiability criterion. For 10 points, name this philosophical problem concerning how to distinguish disciplines like astronomy from those like astrology. ■END■
Buzzes
Summary
| Tournament | Edition | Match | Heard | Conv. % | Power % | Neg % | Avg. Buzz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 NAFTA at Stanford | 01/17/2026 | ✕ | 4 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 75.75 |
| 2026 NAFTA at UBC | 01/17/2026 | ✕ | 2 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 108.00 |
| 2025 NAFTA Online | 02/14/2026 | ✕ | 4 | 100% | 0% | 25% | 88.50 |
| 2026 NAFTA at Vanderbilt | 02/14/2026 | ✕ | 3 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 72.00 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Toronto | 09/13/2025 | ✓ | 4 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 83.00 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Toronto | 09/13/2025 | ✓ | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 90.00 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Maryland | 09/27/2025 | ✓ | 5 | 80% | 20% | 40% | 105.00 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Harvard | 10/04/2025 | ✕ | 3 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 77.00 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Oxford | 10/11/2025 | ✕ | 4 | 100% | 25% | 0% | 80.00 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Chicago | 11/08/2025 | ✕ | 6 | 83% | 33% | 50% | 80.60 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Columbia | 11/08/2025 | ✕ | 5 | 100% | 20% | 0% | 86.40 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Richmond | 12/20/2025 | ✕ | 2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 77.00 |