Round 8: Tossup 3

Description acceptable. The immorality of recommending this act is demonstrated with an example involving a bathtub in James Rachels’ “Bare Difference Argument.” This is the second title act of a book that contrasts a case involving sending an envelope with one where a Mercedes owner encounters a trespassing birdwatcher. A philosopher who wrote that “negative duties” govern this act defined it in terms of uninitiated sequences. A Peter Singer-inspired book (15[1])titled (*) Living High and [this act] is by Peter (10[1])Unger. According to Philippa Foot, abortion is not an example of this act and is thus morally wrong. (-5[1])Judith Jarvis Thomson considers unplugging (10[1])the famous violinist to be an example of this act. For 10 points, withholding medical (10[1])care as part of passive euthanasia is an example of what act of omission often contrasted with killing? ■END■ (10[1])

ANSWER: letting die [accept word forms like let die; accept allowing harm or allowing death; accept descriptions of deliberately not saving a life or not saving a pregnant mother’s life; accept Living High and Letting Die; accept passive euthanasia or non-voluntary passive euthanasia before read; prompt on acts of omission or descriptions of inaction by asking “which have what outcome?”; prompt on descriptions of not aborting by asking “which has what consequence?”; reject “euthanasia” or “killing”]
<AM, Philosophy> | NAFTA-Packet-8
= Average correct buzzpoint

Back to tossups