Packet 8: Tossup 3
Description acceptable. The immorality of recommending this act is demonstrated with an example involving a bathtub in James Rachels’ “Bare Difference Argument.” This is the second title act of a book that contrasts a case involving sending an envelope with one where a Mercedes owner encounters a trespassing birdwatcher. A philosopher who wrote that “negative duties” govern this act defined it in terms of uninitiated sequences. A Peter Singer-inspired book titled (*) Living High and [this act] is by Peter Unger. According to Philippa Foot, abortion is not an example of this act and is thus impermissible. Judith Jarvis Thomson considers unplugging the famous violinist to be an example of this act. For 10 points, withholding medical care as part of passive euthanasia is an example of what act of omission often contrasted with killing? ■END■
Buzzes
Summary
| Tournament | Edition | Match | Heard | Conv. % | Power % | Neg % | Avg. Buzz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 NAFTA at Stanford | 01/17/2026 | ✕ | 4 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 69.25 |
| 2026 NAFTA at UBC | 01/17/2026 | ✕ | 2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 77.00 |
| 2025 NAFTA Online | 02/14/2026 | ✕ | 4 | 75% | 0% | 50% | 120.33 |
| 2026 NAFTA at Vanderbilt | 02/14/2026 | ✕ | 3 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 113.50 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Toronto | 09/13/2025 | ✓ | 5 | 100% | 0% | 80% | 127.60 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Maryland | 09/27/2025 | ✓ | 5 | 100% | 0% | 80% | 120.80 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Harvard | 10/04/2025 | ✕ | 3 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 95.67 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Oxford | 10/11/2025 | ✕ | 4 | 75% | 0% | 75% | 115.00 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Chicago | 11/08/2025 | ✕ | 6 | 83% | 17% | 33% | 75.80 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Columbia | 11/08/2025 | ✕ | 5 | 100% | 20% | 20% | 99.80 |
| 2025 NAFTA at Richmond | 12/20/2025 | ✕ | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 82.50 |